GeForce 920A vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 920A and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 920A stacks up against Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 920A
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920A | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 554 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- GeForce 920A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 920A and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 560% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce 920A and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 513% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 505% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 62% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 862% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920A | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Code name | GK208B | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 15 August 2020 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 915 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.5 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |