GeForce GTX 280 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
When comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 280
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 896 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 444% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 145% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 775% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 268% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 477% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 275% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 766% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 542% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Code name | GT200 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 15 August 2020 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395