GeForce GTX 560 SE vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
When comparing GeForce GTX 560 SE and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 560 SE and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 560 SE
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 560 SE is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 560 SE is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560 SE is 336 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
GeForce GTX 560 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
21−24
40−45
medium / 1080p
10−12
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
9−10
low / 720p
30−35
70−75
medium / 1080p
16−18
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p
160−170
230−240
medium / 768p
130−140
200−210
ultra / 1080p
65−70
120−130
QHD / 1440p
35−40
100−110
4K / 2160p
27−30
55−60
high / 768p
100−105
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
55−60
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
medium / 768p
70−75
110−120
ultra / 1080p
40−45
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
high / 1080p
10−12
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
20−22
4K / 2160p
4−5
8−9
low / 720p
24−27
55−60
medium / 1080p
10−12
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
70−75
130−140
medium / 1080p
30−35
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
27−30
QHD / 1440p
3−4
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 135% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p
60−65
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
95−100
high / 1080p
16−18
45−50
ultra / 1080p
8−9
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−12
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
16−18
40−45
medium / 1080p
8−9
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p
100−105
120−130
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
16−18
40−45
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p
30−35
80−85
medium / 768p
21−24
50−55
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
4K / 2160p
6−7
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 137% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
40−45
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 560 SE.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 560 SE
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
GF114
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
20 February 2012
15 August 2020
Pipelines
288
96
Core clock speed
736 MHz
400 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
35.33
Floating-point performance
847.9 gflops
Length
210 mm
Memory bus width
192 Bit
Memory clock speed
3828 MHz
Memory bandwidth
91.87 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
