GeForce GTX 850A vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 850A will be the best choice, for others Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 850A
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 850A is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 850A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 502 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- GeForce GTX 850A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 444% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 141% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 268% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 477% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 766% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 542% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Code name | GM107 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 15 August 2020 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 936 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.44 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,198 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon HD 7670A
- GeForce GTX 850A vs GeForce 840M
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon HD 7670A
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce 840M
- GeForce GTX 850A vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395