GRID K140Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

When comparing GRID K140Q and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K140Q and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K140Q

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Check Price

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K140Q	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K140Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 450 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	21−24
ultra / 1080p	0−1	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	9−10	40−45
medium / 1080p	1−2	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 600% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	−	35−40
ultra / 1080p	1−2	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 720p	8−9	70−75
medium / 1080p	2−3	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 1125% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K140Q and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	100−110	230−240
medium / 768p	75−80	200−210
ultra / 1080p	30−33	120−130
QHD / 1440p	−	100−110
4K / 2160p	9−10	55−60
high / 768p	50−55	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 189% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	55−60
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	65−70	120−130
medium / 768p	35−40	110−120
ultra / 1080p	12−14	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 179% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	20−22
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	6−7	55−60
medium / 1080p	1−2	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 1000% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	−	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
low / 720p	40−45	130−140
medium / 1080p	2−3	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 381% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	10−12	75−80
medium / 1080p	3−4	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 757% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	35−40	110−120
medium / 768p	−	95−100
high / 1080p	0−1	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 210% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	0−1	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	20−22
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
high / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K140Q.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	75−80
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 131% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	1−2	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 4100% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	3−4	80−85
medium / 768p	−	50−55
high / 1080p	1−2	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2650% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	65−70	90−95
medium / 768p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−11	40−45
high / 768p	24−27	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GRID K140Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K140Q	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	GK107	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	28 June 2013	15 August 2020
Pipelines	192	96
Core clock speed	850 MHz	400 MHz
Boost Clock		1350 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID K140Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares