GRID K260Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K260Q and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K260Q stacks up against Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, check out specs charts below.

GRID K260Q

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Check Price

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 345 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	21−24
ultra / 1080p	9−10	12−14
QHD / 1440p	3−4	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	30−35	40−45
medium / 1080p	18−20	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 53% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	35−40
ultra / 1080p	21−24	30−35
QHD / 1440p	7−8	14−16
4K / 2160p	5−6	9−10
low / 720p	50−55	70−75
medium / 1080p	27−30	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 47% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	210−220	230−240
medium / 768p	180−190	200−210
ultra / 1080p	95−100	120−130
QHD / 1440p	50−55	100−110
4K / 2160p	30−33	55−60
high / 768p	140−150	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	55−60
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	90−95	110−120
ultra / 1080p	60−65	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	27−30
ultra / 1080p	16−18	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	20−22
4K / 2160p	6−7	8−9
low / 720p	35−40	55−60
medium / 1080p	18−20	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	35−40
ultra / 1080p	18−20	27−30
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	95−100	130−140
medium / 1080p	50−55	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 40% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	35−40
ultra / 1080p	20−22	27−30
QHD / 1440p	9−10	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	75−80
medium / 1080p	27−30	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 48% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
medium / 768p	75−80	95−100
high / 1080p	30−33	45−50
ultra / 1080p	12−14	18−20
QHD / 1440p	3−4	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 35% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	9−10	14−16
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	2−3	3−4
low / 720p	27−30	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 9% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	75−80
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 8% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	16−18
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	27−30	40−45
medium / 1080p	16−18	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 35% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	55−60	80−85
medium / 768p	30−35	50−55
high / 1080p	18−20	27−30
ultra / 1080p	10−12	16−18
4K / 2160p	8−9	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 52% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	40−45
high / 768p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	GK104	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	28 June 2013	15 August 2020
Pipelines	1536	96
Core clock speed	745 MHz	400 MHz
Boost Clock		1350 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID K260Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares