Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 stacks up against Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, check out specs charts below.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Memory type
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Core clock speed of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 200 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
21−24
40−45
medium / 1080p
10−12
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
9−10
low / 720p
30−35
70−75
medium / 1080p
16−18
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 142% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
160−170
230−240
medium / 768p
130−140
200−210
ultra / 1080p
65−70
120−130
QHD / 1440p
35−40
100−110
4K / 2160p
27−30
55−60
high / 768p
100−110
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
55−60
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
medium / 768p
70−75
110−120
ultra / 1080p
40−45
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 57% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
10−12
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
20−22
4K / 2160p
4−5
8−9
low / 720p
24−27
55−60
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
70−75
130−140
medium / 1080p
30−35
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 102% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
27−30
QHD / 1440p
3−4
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 135% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
60−65
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
95−100
high / 1080p
18−20
45−50
ultra / 1080p
8−9
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 91% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−12
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
8−9
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 48% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
16−18
40−45
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 91% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
30−35
80−85
medium / 768p
21−24
50−55
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
4K / 2160p
7−8
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 137% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
40−45
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
Haswell GT3e
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
5 June 2013
15 August 2020
Pipelines
40
96
Core clock speed
200 MHz
400 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1350 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
Shared memory
+
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
+
Check Price
Check Price
