Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro CX
When comparing Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro CX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro CX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro CX
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Quadro CX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Quadro CX - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro CX is 202 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 520% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 600% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | − |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 156% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 31% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 136% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 775% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 326% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 275% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 1200% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 117% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 550% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 800% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Quadro CX | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 15 August 2020 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 96 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 602 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Quadro CX vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GT 645M
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics