Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro FX 3800
In this comparison between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro FX 3800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 3800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 3800
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 200 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 483% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 1125% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 189% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 165% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 1200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 360% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 766% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 326% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 4100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 131% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2000% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1733% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 85% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 August 2020 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GT 440
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro K600
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GT 440
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro K600