Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro K1000M
In this comparison between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro K1000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs will be the best choice, for others Quadro K1000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro K1000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro K1000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs or Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Quadro K1000M
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 450 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro K1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
0−1
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
8−9
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
1−2
medium / 1080p
27−30
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
35−40
−
ultra / 1080p
30−35
−
QHD / 1440p
14−16
0−1
4K / 2160p
9−10
−
low / 720p
70−75
0−1
medium / 1080p
40−45
−
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
60−65
medium / 768p
200−210
27−30
ultra / 1080p
120−130
7−8
QHD / 1440p
100−110
−
4K / 2160p
55−60
−
high / 768p
170−180
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 560% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
55−60
0−1
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
45−50
medium / 768p
110−120
10−11
ultra / 1080p
85−90
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
QHD / 1440p
20−22
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
55−60
0−1
medium / 1080p
30−33
−
high / 1080p
35−40
−
ultra / 1080p
27−30
−
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
130−140
21−24
medium / 1080p
75−80
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 513% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
35−40
0−1
ultra / 1080p
27−30
−
QHD / 1440p
16−18
0−1
4K / 2160p
14−16
−
low / 720p
75−80
0−1
medium / 1080p
40−45
0−1
low / 768p
110−120
18−20
medium / 768p
95−100
−
high / 1080p
45−50
0−1
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
9−10
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 505% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
QHD / 1440p
10−12
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
40−45
0−1
medium / 1080p
20−22
−
low / 768p
120−130
75−80
high / 1080p
−
27−30
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 62% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
75−80
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 862% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
40−45
0−1
medium / 1080p
21−24
−
low / 768p
80−85
0−1
medium / 768p
50−55
−
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
9−10
−
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
14−16
ultra / 1080p
40−45
0−1
high / 768p
55−60
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Quadro K1000M.
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Quadro K1000M
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Kepler
Code name
Tiger Lake Xe
N14P-Q1
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
15 August 2020
1 June 2012
Pipelines
96
192
Core clock speed
400 MHz
850 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
10 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
13.60
Floating-point performance
326.4 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
DirectX 12_1
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
10 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
