Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro K2200M
When comparing Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro K2200M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro K2200M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K2200M
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Quadro K2200M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 267 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 9% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 5% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 14% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 15% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Quadro K2200M | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Maxwell |
Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 15 August 2020 | 19 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 96 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 667 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 | |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Optimus | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Quadro K2200M vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs FirePro S9050
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GRID M60 8Q
- Quadro K2200M vs FirePro S9050
- Quadro K2200M vs GRID M60 8Q