Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon HD 4830
In this comparison between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon HD 4830 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4830 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4830
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon HD 4830 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4830 - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon HD 4830 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4830 is 175 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4830 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 483% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 716% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon HD 4830 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | − |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 165% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 147% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 875% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 326% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 642% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 300% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 1300% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 117% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 766% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 6−7 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 980% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 70% more, than Radeon HD 4830. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon HD 4830 | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | TeraScale |
Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | RV770 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 15 August 2020 | 21 October 2008 |
Pipelines | 96 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 575 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.40 | |
Floating-point performance | 736.0 gflops | |
Length | 246 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Radeon HD 4830 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Radeon HD 4830 vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R5 M435
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs UHD Graphics 615
- Radeon HD 4830 vs Radeon R5 M435
- Radeon HD 4830 vs UHD Graphics 615