Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon Pro SSG
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Pro SSG. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Pro SSG. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon Pro SSG
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | HBM2 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro SSG - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon Pro SSG - with GCN 5.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro SSG is 1040 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro SSG - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 130% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Battlefield 5 is 141% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro SSG. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 230−240 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Far Cry 5 is 128% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Fortnite is 106% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Forza Horizon 4 is 127% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 150−160 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Grand Theft Auto V is 84% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Metro Exodus is 170% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Pro SSG have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 164% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 175% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 155% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon Pro SSG | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Vega 10 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 15 August 2020 | 8 August 2017 |
Pipelines | 96 | 4096 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 | |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.125 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Radeon Pro SSG vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Radeon Pro SSG vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- Radeon Pro SSG vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Radeon Pro SSG vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU