Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon Pro W5500M
When choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Pro W5500M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Pro W5500M.
Radeon Pro W5500M
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 53% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 54% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 26% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 40% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 53% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 46% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 35% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 58% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Navi 14 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 15 August 2020 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 96 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 1450 MHz |
Transistor count | 6,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 127.6 | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GT 1030
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon RX 540
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs GeForce GT 1030
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs Radeon RX 540