Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
In this comparison between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Pro WX 5100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 5100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro WX 5100
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 5100 is 313 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 58% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Pro WX 5100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Pro WX 5100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Fortnite is 47% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 63% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Ellesmere |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 15 August 2020 | 18 November 2016 |
Pipelines | 96 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 713 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 1086 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 121.6 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 250 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics