Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
In this comparison between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs or Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
65 Watt
Interface
IGP
Memory type
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL - with Vega.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is 531 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
8−9
16−18
4K / 2160p
5−6
10−11
low / 720p
40−45
60−65
medium / 1080p
27−30
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
high / 1080p
35−40
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−35
45−50
QHD / 1440p
14−16
35−40
4K / 2160p
9−10
18−20
low / 720p
70−75
100−110
medium / 1080p
40−45
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 58% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
250−260
medium / 768p
200−210
220−230
ultra / 1080p
120−130
180−190
QHD / 1440p
100−110
110−120
4K / 2160p
55−60
70−75
high / 768p
170−180
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
55−60
−
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
85−90
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
high / 1080p
27−30
45−50
ultra / 1080p
24−27
40−45
QHD / 1440p
20−22
27−30
4K / 2160p
8−9
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
80−85
medium / 1080p
30−33
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
high / 1080p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
45−50
QHD / 1440p
16−18
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
130−140
180−190
medium / 1080p
75−80
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 47% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
high / 1080p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
45−50
QHD / 1440p
16−18
30−35
4K / 2160p
14−16
24−27
low / 720p
75−80
100−110
medium / 1080p
40−45
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
low / 768p
110−120
140−150
medium / 768p
95−100
120−130
high / 1080p
45−50
70−75
ultra / 1080p
18−20
30−35
QHD / 1440p
9−10
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−12
20−22
QHD / 1440p
10−12
16−18
4K / 2160p
3−4
8−9
low / 720p
40−45
65−70
medium / 1080p
20−22
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
low / 768p
120−130
130−140
medium / 1080p
110−120
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
75−80
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
high / 1080p
16−18
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−12
16−18
QHD / 1440p
3−4
10−11
4K / 2160p
2−3
7−8
low / 720p
40−45
65−70
medium / 1080p
21−24
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
low / 768p
80−85
130−140
medium / 768p
50−55
85−90
high / 1080p
27−30
45−50
ultra / 1080p
16−18
24−27
4K / 2160p
9−10
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 63% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
50−55
high / 768p
55−60
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Vega
Code name
Tiger Lake Xe
Vega Kaby Lake-G
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
15 August 2020
7 January 2018
Pipelines
96
1280
Core clock speed
400 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1011 MHz
Transistor count
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
10 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
80.88
Memory bus width
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
DirectX 12_1
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
