Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R5 430 OEM. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R5 430 OEM. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 330 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 512% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 775% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 293% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 475% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 213% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 766% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 52% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 117% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 542% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Oland |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 August 2020 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 | |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro K2000M
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs UHD Graphics 620
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs UHD Graphics 620