Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R7 A265

In this comparison between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R7 A265 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A265 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Check Price

Radeon R7 A265

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Laptops

Main Specs

	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Radeon R7 A265
Interface		PCIe 3.0 x8
Memory type		DDR3
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Display Connectors		No outputs
	Check Price

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A265 - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	21−24	1−2
ultra / 1080p	12−14	0−1
QHD / 1440p	8−9	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	40−45	12−14
medium / 1080p	27−30	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	35−40	−
ultra / 1080p	30−35	3−4
QHD / 1440p	14−16	0−1
4K / 2160p	9−10	−
low / 720p	70−75	12−14
medium / 1080p	40−45	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 600% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	110−120
medium / 768p	200−210	85−90
ultra / 1080p	120−130	35−40
QHD / 1440p	100−110	−
4K / 2160p	55−60	10−11
high / 768p	170−180	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 156% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	55−60	14−16
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 31% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	120−130	70−75
medium / 768p	110−120	45−50
ultra / 1080p	85−90	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 136% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	27−30	2−3
ultra / 1080p	24−27	2−3
QHD / 1440p	20−22	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
low / 720p	55−60	10−11
medium / 1080p	30−33	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 775% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	35−40	−
ultra / 1080p	27−30	5−6
QHD / 1440p	16−18	1−2
low / 720p	130−140	45−50
medium / 1080p	75−80	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 326% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	35−40	3−4
ultra / 1080p	27−30	−
QHD / 1440p	16−18	0−1
4K / 2160p	14−16	−
low / 720p	75−80	14−16
medium / 1080p	40−45	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	110−120	40−45
medium / 768p	95−100	−
high / 1080p	45−50	3−4
ultra / 1080p	18−20	2−3
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 275% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	14−16	1−2
ultra / 1080p	10−12	0−1
QHD / 1440p	10−12	−
4K / 2160p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	3−4
medium / 1080p	20−22	2−3
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 1200% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	120−130	85−90
high / 1080p	−	55−60
medium / 1080p	110−120	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	75−80	24−27
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 117% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	10−12	3−4
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	40−45	4−5
medium / 1080p	21−24	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 550% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	80−85	8−9
medium / 768p	50−55	7−8
high / 1080p	27−30	3−4
ultra / 1080p	16−18	3−4
4K / 2160p	9−10	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 800% more, than Radeon R7 A265.
low / 768p	90−95	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	40−45	12−14
high / 768p	55−60	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Radeon R7 A265.

Full Specs

	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Radeon R7 A265
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake	GCN 1.0
Code name	Tiger Lake Xe	Opal
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	15 August 2020	9 January 2014
Pipelines	96	384
Core clock speed	400 MHz	725 MHz
Boost Clock	1350 MHz	825 MHz
Transistor count		950 million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate		19.80
Floating-point performance		633.6 gflops
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth		28.8 GB/s
Shared memory	+
DirectX	DirectX 12_1	12 (11_1)
Shader Model		5.1
OpenGL		4.6
OpenCL		1.2
Vulkan		1.2.131
Quick Sync	+
	Check Price

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R7 A265

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares