Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R7 M270DX
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R7 M270DX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R7 M270DX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Interface | IGP | |
Memory type | System Shared | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 500 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 512% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 154% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 127% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 650% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 255% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 428% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 275% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 766% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 660% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Topaz |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 15 August 2020 | 11 June 2014 |
Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 940 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,550 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 22.56 | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon E6760
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs HD Graphics 515
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon E6760
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs HD Graphics 515