Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R8 M535DX
In this comparison between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R8 M535DX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs will be the best choice, for others Radeon R8 M535DX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R8 M535DX
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
Interface | IGP | |
Memory type | System Shared | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Radeon R8 M535DX - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon R8 M535DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R8 M535DX is 380 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon R8 M535DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | − |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | − |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 560% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 513% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 505% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 62% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 862% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Meso |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 15 August 2020 | 18 April 2017 |
Pipelines | 96 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 780 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 891 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,550 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.82 | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Radeon R8 M535DX vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Radeon R8 M535DX vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs NVS 510
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GRID K160Q
- Radeon R8 M535DX vs NVS 510
- Radeon R8 M535DX vs GRID K160Q