Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 A375
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R9 A375, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs stacks up against Radeon R9 A375, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R9 A375
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 500 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 444% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 141% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 31% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 122% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 650% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 268% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 428% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 233% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 766% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 660% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 15 August 2020 | no data |
Pipelines | 96 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4.5 GB/s | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M