Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M375X
When comparing Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R9 M375X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon R9 M375X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M375X
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon R9 M375X | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M375X - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon R9 M375X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M375X is 525 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M375X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 142% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 102% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 122% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 42% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 76% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 123% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon R9 M375X | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Tropo |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 15 August 2020 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 96 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 1015 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Radeon R9 M375X vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Radeon R9 M375X vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI
- Radeon R9 M375X vs Radeon HD 5850
- Radeon R9 M375X vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI