Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon Sky 500
When choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Sky 500, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Sky 500.
Radeon Sky 500
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon Sky 500 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Radeon Sky 500 - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon Sky 500 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Sky 500 is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon Sky 500 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Battlefield 5 is 58% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Sky 500 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon Sky 500 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Fortnite is 47% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 63% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon Sky 500 | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Pitcairn |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 15 August 2020 | 27 March 2013 |
Pipelines | 96 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 950 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Length | 242 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 154 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Radeon Sky 500 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Radeon Sky 500 vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 270X
- Radeon Sky 500 vs Radeon R9 M395
- Radeon Sky 500 vs Radeon R9 270X