Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Tesla M10
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Tesla M10, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs stacks up against Tesla M10, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M10
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 633 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 22% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 26% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 August 2020 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |