Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Tesla M2070 Q
When choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Tesla M2070 Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Tesla M2070 Q.
Tesla M2070 Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 174 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 318% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | − |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 119% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 31% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 98% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 180% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 283% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 172% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 420% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 43% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 85% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 228% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 322% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Fermi |
Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 15 August 2020 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 96 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Tesla M2070 Q vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X