FirePro V4900 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
When comparing FirePro V4900 and Iris Xe Graphics G7, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V4900 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
FirePro V4900
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V4900 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
16−18
ultra / 1080p
1−2
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
4−5
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
low / 720p
16−18
55−60
medium / 1080p
6−7
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 312% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
35−40
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
110−120
210−220
medium / 768p
90−95
180−190
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
55−60
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
65−70
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 107% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
75−80
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
50−55
95−100
ultra / 1080p
24−27
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 86% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
3−4
18−20
ultra / 1080p
2−3
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
4−5
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 320% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
10−12
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
20−22
QHD / 1440p
4−5
12−14
low / 720p
50−55
100−110
medium / 1080p
12−14
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 158% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
9−10
low / 720p
18−20
55−60
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 275% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
80−85
high / 1080p
6−7
30−35
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 139% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−11
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
5−6
30−35
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
60−65
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro V4900.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
12−14
55−60
medium / 768p
10−11
35−40
high / 1080p
5−6
20−22
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−12
4K / 2160p
2−3
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 271% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−33
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 45% more, than FirePro V4900.
Full Specs
FirePro V4900
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
Turks
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 November 2011
15 August 2020
Pipelines
480
96
Core clock speed
800 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
Floating-point performance
768.0 gflops
Length
163 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.0
OpenGL
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
73 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
