FirePro V5800 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

In this comparison between FirePro V5800 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5800 will be the best choice, for others Iris Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro V5800

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro V5800	Iris Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)	74 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
		Check Price

FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	6−7	16−18
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	16−18	30−35
medium / 1080p	7−8	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	10−12	24−27
ultra / 1080p	9−10	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
low / 720p	21−24	55−60
medium / 1080p	10−12	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 153% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	130−140	210−220
medium / 768p	100−110	180−190
ultra / 1080p	50−55	100−110
QHD / 1440p	27−30	55−60
4K / 2160p	27−30	30−33
high / 768p	75−80	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 31% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
medium / 768p	55−60	95−100
ultra / 1080p	30−35	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 69% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	7−8	18−20
ultra / 1080p	7−8	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	3−4	6−7
low / 720p	18−20	40−45
medium / 1080p	8−9	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−11	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	12−14
low / 720p	55−60	100−110
medium / 1080p	21−24	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 100% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	10−12	27−30
ultra / 1080p	10−11	21−24
QHD / 1440p	1−2	9−10
low / 720p	24−27	55−60
medium / 1080p	12−14	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	50−55	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	80−85
high / 1080p	10−12	30−35
ultra / 1080p	6−7	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 96% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	4−5	10−11
ultra / 1080p	3−4	8−9
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	10−12	30−35
medium / 1080p	6−7	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	90−95	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 25% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	30−35	60−65
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	7−8	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	10−12	30−35
medium / 1080p	10−11	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	21−24	55−60
medium / 768p	16−18	35−40
high / 1080p	9−10	20−22
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 138% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	35−40
high / 768p	35−40	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 32% more, than FirePro V5800.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5800	Iris Xe Graphics G7
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	Juniper	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	26 April 2010	15 August 2020
Pipelines	800	96
Core clock speed	690 MHz
Transistor count	1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	27.60
Floating-point performance	1,104.0 gflops
Length	229 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.0
OpenGL	4.4
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	N/A
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

FirePro V5800 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares