FirePro W7000 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

When choosing between FirePro W7000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W7000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7.

FirePro W7000 Check Price

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W7000	Iris Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W7000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
FirePro W7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
FirePro W7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	9−10
QHD / 1440p	6−7	3−4
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	40−45	30−35
medium / 1080p	24−27	20−22
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	30−35	24−27
ultra / 1080p	27−30	21−24
QHD / 1440p	12−14	5−6
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	65−70	55−60
medium / 1080p	35−40	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Battlefield 5 is 29% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W7000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	210−220
medium / 768p	200−210	180−190
ultra / 1080p	120−130	100−110
QHD / 1440p	90−95	55−60
4K / 2160p	50−55	30−33
high / 768p	170−180	140−150
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	40−45
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	100−110	95−100
ultra / 1080p	80−85	65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	24−27	18−20
ultra / 1080p	21−24	18−20
QHD / 1440p	18−20	16−18
4K / 2160p	8−9	6−7
low / 720p	50−55	40−45
medium / 1080p	27−30	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	30−35	24−27
ultra / 1080p	24−27	20−22
QHD / 1440p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	120−130	100−110
medium / 1080p	70−75	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Fortnite is 22% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	35−40	27−30
ultra / 1080p	27−30	21−24
QHD / 1440p	14−16	9−10
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	70−75	55−60
medium / 1080p	40−45	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	95−100	80−85
high / 1080p	40−45	30−35
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
QHD / 1440p	7−8	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	12−14	10−11
ultra / 1080p	10−11	8−9
QHD / 1440p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	3−4	1−2
low / 720p	40−45	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 1080p	110−120	110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	70−75	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	16−18	12−14
ultra / 1080p	10−11	8−9
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	40−45	30−35
medium / 1080p	21−24	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 35% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	75−80	55−60
medium / 768p	45−50	35−40
high / 1080p	24−27	20−22
ultra / 1080p	14−16	10−12
4K / 2160p	8−9	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	35−40
high / 768p	55−60	50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.

Full Specs

	FirePro W7000	Iris Xe Graphics G7
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	Pitcairn	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	13 June 2012	15 August 2020
Pipelines	1280	96
Core clock speed	950 MHz
Transistor count	2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	76.00
Floating-point performance	2,432 gflops
Length	242 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	153.6 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_1)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	285 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)	6 Mh/s
Quick Sync		+
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W7000 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares