FireStream 9370 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others Iris Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 23% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 15% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 9% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 13% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 18% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Cypress | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000