GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Xe Graphics G7, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 SE stacks up against Iris Xe Graphics G7, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GF104 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 288 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000