Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be the best choice, for others Iris Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Memory type
System Shared
DDR4
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
16−18
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
5−6
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
low / 720p
16−18
55−60
medium / 1080p
8−9
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 227% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
210−220
medium / 768p
85−90
180−190
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
55−60
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
60−65
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 38% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
95−100
ultra / 1080p
24−27
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 93% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
18−20
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
6−7
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
low / 720p
50−55
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
9−10
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
low / 720p
18−20
55−60
medium / 1080p
10−11
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
40−45
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
80−85
high / 1080p
8−9
30−35
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 139% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
3−4
10−11
ultra / 1080p
2−3
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
8−9
30−35
medium / 1080p
5−6
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
16−18
55−60
medium / 768p
12−14
35−40
high / 1080p
7−8
20−22
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 48% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
2 June 2015
15 August 2020
Pipelines
48
96
Core clock speed
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
Shared memory
+
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.80
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
+
Check Price
Check Price
