Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro FX 3800

In this comparison between Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Quadro FX 3800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Xe Graphics G7 will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 3800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

Quadro FX 3800

Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	Iris Xe Graphics G7	Quadro FX 3800
Power consumption (TDP)		108 Watt
Interface		PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
Memory type	DDR4	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount		1 GB
Display Connectors		1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price

Iris Xe Graphics G7 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	0−1
ultra / 1080p	9−10	0−1
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	10−11
medium / 1080p	20−22	1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	21−24	2−3
QHD / 1440p	5−6	0−1
low / 720p	55−60	9−10
medium / 1080p	27−30	2−3
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 800% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	210−220	100−110
medium / 768p	180−190	75−80
ultra / 1080p	100−110	30−35
QHD / 1440p	55−60	−
4K / 2160p	30−33	9−10
high / 768p	140−150	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 147% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	40−45	12−14
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	110−120	65−70
medium / 768p	95−100	40−45
ultra / 1080p	65−70	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 126% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	18−20	1−2
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	7−8
medium / 1080p	21−24	2−3
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 833% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	20−22	−
QHD / 1440p	12−14	0−1
low / 720p	100−110	40−45
medium / 1080p	55−60	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 252% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	27−30	1−2
ultra / 1080p	21−24	−
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
low / 720p	55−60	12−14
medium / 1080p	30−35	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	90−95	35−40
medium / 768p	80−85	−
high / 1080p	30−35	1−2
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
medium / 720p	−	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	10−11	0−1
ultra / 1080p	8−9	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	1−2
medium / 1080p	14−16	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 3100% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	110−120	85−90
high / 1080p	−	50−55
medium / 1080p	110−120	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	60−65	21−24
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	2−3
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1500% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	55−60	4−5
medium / 768p	35−40	−
high / 1080p	20−22	2−3
ultra / 1080p	10−12	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1200% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	90−95	65−70
medium / 768p	60−65	30−35
ultra / 1080p	35−40	10−12
high / 768p	50−55	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 79% more, than Quadro FX 3800.

Full Specs

	Iris Xe Graphics G7	Quadro FX 3800
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake	Tesla 2.0
Code name	Tiger Lake Xe	GT200B
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	15 August 2020	30 March 2009
Pipelines	96	192
Core clock speed		600 MHz
Transistor count		1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	55 nm
Texture fill rate		38.40
Floating-point performance		462.3 gflops
Length		198 mm
Memory bus width		256 Bit
Memory clock speed		1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth		51.2 GB/s
Shared memory	+
DirectX	DirectX 12_1	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model		4.0
OpenGL		3.3
OpenCL		1.1
Vulkan		N/A
CUDA		1.3
Quick Sync	+
	Check Price

Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro FX 3800

Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares