Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro P2000
In this comparison between Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Quadro P2000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Xe Graphics G7 will be the best choice, for others Quadro P2000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Quadro P2000
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
5 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is used in Laptops, and Quadro P2000 - in Desktops.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Quadro P2000 - with Pascal.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 - by 16 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
9−10
24−27
QHD / 1440p
3−4
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
20−22
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 137% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
24−27
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
50−55
QHD / 1440p
5−6
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
55−60
100−110
medium / 1080p
27−30
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Battlefield 5 is 137% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Quadro P2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
250−260
medium / 768p
180−190
220−230
ultra / 1080p
100−110
180−190
QHD / 1440p
55−60
110−120
4K / 2160p
30−33
70−75
high / 768p
140−150
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
−
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Quadro P2000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
95−100
110−120
ultra / 1080p
65−70
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
18−20
45−50
ultra / 1080p
18−20
40−45
QHD / 1440p
16−18
30−33
4K / 2160p
6−7
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
80−85
medium / 1080p
21−24
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Far Cry 5 is 114% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
24−27
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
50−55
QHD / 1440p
12−14
30−33
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
100−110
180−190
medium / 1080p
55−60
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 102% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
27−30
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
QHD / 1440p
9−10
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
55−60
110−120
medium / 1080p
30−35
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
90−95
140−150
medium / 768p
80−85
130−140
high / 1080p
30−35
70−75
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−35
QHD / 1440p
3−4
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 86% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
10−11
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
1−2
9−10
low / 720p
30−35
70−75
medium / 1080p
14−16
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Metro Exodus is 153% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
110−120
130−140
medium / 1080p
110−120
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
30−35
70−75
medium / 1080p
16−18
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 123% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
55−60
130−140
medium / 768p
35−40
85−90
high / 1080p
20−22
50−55
ultra / 1080p
10−12
27−30
4K / 2160p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 146% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
55−60
high / 768p
50−55
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Quadro P2000
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Pascal
Code name
Tiger Lake Xe
GP106
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
15 August 2020
6 February 2017
Pipelines
96
1024
Core clock speed
1076 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
Transistor count
4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
10 nm
16 nm
Texture fill rate
94.72
Floating-point performance
3,031 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
160 Bit
Memory clock speed
7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
140.2 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
DirectX 12_1
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
CUDA
6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.19 kh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
