Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon R7 A360
In this comparison between Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon R7 A360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Xe Graphics G7 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 A360
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A360 - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A360 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 478% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 265% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 377% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Meso |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 August 2020 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,550 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.52 | |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3.6 GB/s | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- Radeon R7 A360 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- Radeon R7 A360 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce 720A
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon HD 6550A
- Radeon R7 A360 vs GeForce 720A
- Radeon R7 A360 vs Radeon HD 6550A