FirePro W4300 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W4300 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W4300 stacks up against Iris Xe MAX Graphics, check out specs charts below.

FirePro W4300 Check Price

Iris Xe MAX Graphics Check Price

Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Xe MAX Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe MAX Graphics here:

Iris Xe MAX Graphics Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W4300	Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	LPDDR4x
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 MB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4300 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
FirePro W4300 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe MAX Graphics - in Laptops.
FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Iris Xe MAX Graphics - with Gen. 12 Xe.
FirePro W4300 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe MAX Graphics - by 10 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 1734 MHz higher, than Iris Xe MAX Graphics.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	35−40
ultra / 1080p	8−9	21−24
QHD / 1440p	3−4	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	30−35	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p	24−27	55−60
ultra / 1080p	20−22	45−50
QHD / 1440p	7−8	35−40
4K / 2160p	5−6	18−20
low / 720p	50−55	100−110
medium / 1080p	24−27	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	200−210	250−260
medium / 768p	170−180	220−230
ultra / 1080p	95−100	180−190
QHD / 1440p	50−55	110−120
4K / 2160p	30−33	70−75
high / 768p	140−150	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	90−95	110−120
ultra / 1080p	60−65	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Dota 2 is 27% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p	16−18	45−50
ultra / 1080p	16−18	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	6−7	14−16
low / 720p	35−40	80−85
medium / 1080p	18−20	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p	24−27	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	45−50
QHD / 1440p	16−18	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	95−100	180−190
medium / 1080p	50−55	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Fortnite is 107% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p	24−27	60−65
ultra / 1080p	20−22	45−50
QHD / 1440p	9−10	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	50−55	100−110
medium / 1080p	27−30	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	85−90	140−150
medium / 768p	75−80	120−130
high / 1080p	27−30	70−75
ultra / 1080p	12−14	30−35
QHD / 1440p	3−4	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p	9−10	24−27
ultra / 1080p	7−8	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
low / 720p	27−30	65−70
medium / 1080p	12−14	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	110−120	130−140
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Minecraft is 18% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	100−110
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than FirePro W4300.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	9−10	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	27−30	65−70
medium / 1080p	16−18	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	50−55	130−140
medium / 768p	30−35	85−90
high / 1080p	18−20	45−50
ultra / 1080p	10−12	24−27
4K / 2160p	8−9	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	50−55
high / 768p	50−55	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in World of Tanks is 4% more, than FirePro W4300.

Full Specs

	FirePro W4300	Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Gen. 12 Xe
Code name	Bonaire	iDG1LPDEV
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 December 2015	31 October 2020
Pipelines	768	96
Core clock speed	930 MHz
Boost Clock		1650 MHz
Transistor count	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	44.64
Floating-point performance	1,428 gflops
Length	171 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	4266 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (12_0)	DirectX 12.1
Shader Model	6.3
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	152 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4300 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares