FireStream 9370 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
When comparing FireStream 9370 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe MAX Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe MAX Graphics here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | LPDDR4x |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe MAX Graphics - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Xe MAX Graphics - with Gen. 12 Xe.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Xe MAX Graphics - by 10 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 334 MHz higher, than Iris Xe MAX Graphics.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Dota 2 is 38% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Far Cry 5 is 176% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Fortnite is 128% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Minecraft is 23% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 12 Xe |
Code name | Cypress | iDG1LPDEV |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 31 October 2020 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 4266 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | DirectX 12.1 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 670
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs GeForce GTX 670