GRID M6 8Q vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
When choosing between GRID M6 8Q and Iris Xe MAX Graphics, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M6 8Q and Iris Xe MAX Graphics.
GRID M6 8Q
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe MAX Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe MAX Graphics here:
Main Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | LPDDR4x |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Iris Xe MAX Graphics.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe MAX Graphics - in Laptops.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Iris Xe MAX Graphics - with Gen. 12 Xe.
- GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe MAX Graphics - by 10 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 746 MHz higher, than Iris Xe MAX Graphics.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GRID M6 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GRID M6 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID M6 8Q and Iris Xe MAX Graphics have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than GRID M6 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GRID M6 8Q and Iris Xe MAX Graphics have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GRID M6 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than GRID M6 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Fortnite is 77% more, than GRID M6 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than GRID M6 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than GRID M6 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than GRID M6 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Minecraft is 13% more, than GRID M6 8Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GRID M6 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than GRID M6 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than GRID M6 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GRID M6 8Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 12 Xe |
| Code name | GM204 | iDG1LPDEV |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 31 October 2020 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 722 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 69.31 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | DirectX 12.1 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Check Price |