Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Quadro 7000
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Quadro 7000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Xe MAX Graphics stacks up against Quadro 7000, check out specs charts below.
Quadro 7000
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe MAX Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe MAX Graphics here:
Main Specs
| Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Quadro 7000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 204 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | LPDDR4x | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 MB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Iris Xe MAX Graphics.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is used in Laptops, and Quadro 7000 - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is build with Gen. 12 Xe architecture, and Quadro 7000 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro 7000 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 862 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Quadro 7000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Quadro 7000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Fortnite is 81% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Quadro 7000 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 12 Xe | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | iDG1LPDEV | GF110 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 31 October 2020 | 2 May 2012 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 651 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 41.66 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,332 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4266 MHz | 3404 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 163.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12.1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Check Price |