Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Quadro K3000M

    When comparing Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Quadro K3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Quadro K3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    Iris Xe MAX Graphics Check Price
    Quadro K3000M Check Price

    Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Quadro K3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Quadro K3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe MAX Graphics or Quadro K3000M here:

    Iris Xe MAX Graphics Laptops
    Quadro K3000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      Iris Xe MAX Graphics Quadro K3000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt
    Interface MXM-B (3.0)
    Memory type LPDDR4x GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 4 MB 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Quadro K3000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
    • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is used in Laptops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
    • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is build with Gen. 12 Xe architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
    • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 1466 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 35−40 7−8
    ultra / 1080p 21−24 4−5
    QHD / 1440p 16−18 0−1
    4K / 2160p 10−11 −
    low / 720p 60−65 18−20
    medium / 1080p 40−45 9−10
    The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Quadro K3000M.

    Full Specs

      Iris Xe MAX Graphics Quadro K3000M
    Architecture Gen. 12 Xe Kepler
    Code name iDG1LPDEV N14E-Q1
    Type Laptop Mobile workstation
    Release date 31 October 2020 1 June 2012
    Pipelines 96 576
    Core clock speed 654 MHz
    Boost Clock 1650 MHz
    Transistor count 3,540 million
    Manufacturing process technology 10 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 31.39
    Floating-point performance 753.4 gflops
    Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
    Memory clock speed 4266 MHz 2800 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 89.6 GB/s
    Shared memory - -
    DirectX DirectX 12.1 12 (11_0)
    Shader Model 5.1
    OpenGL 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.126
    CUDA +
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 24 Mh/s
    Laptop size large
    Optimus +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares