Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon R7 A360
In this comparison between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon R7 A360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Xe MAX Graphics will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 A360
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe MAX Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe MAX Graphics here:
Main Specs
| Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | LPDDR4x | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 MB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A360.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A360 - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is build with Gen. 12 Xe architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A360 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 4263 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Fortnite is 740% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Minecraft is 75% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in World of Tanks is 188% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 12 Xe | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | iDG1LPDEV | Meso |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 31 October 2020 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,550 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.52 | |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4266 MHz | 3.6 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12.1 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | |
| Check Price |