Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon R8 M535DX
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon R8 M535DX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon R8 M535DX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R8 M535DX
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe MAX Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe MAX Graphics here:
Main Specs
| Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
| Interface | IGP | |
| Memory type | LPDDR4x | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 MB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is used in Laptops, and Radeon R8 M535DX - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is build with Gen. 12 Xe architecture, and Radeon R8 M535DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon R8 M535DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Fortnite is 740% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Minecraft is 75% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in World of Tanks is 188% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
| Architecture | Gen. 12 Xe | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | iDG1LPDEV | Meso |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 31 October 2020 | 18 April 2017 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 891 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,550 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.82 | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4266 MHz | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12.1 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Check Price |