Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 here:
Main Specs
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 116% more power consumption, than Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 has 509 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is build with RV6xx architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is 86 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 2150 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 144% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 111% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 153% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 103% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 21% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2. |
Full Specs
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | RV6xx | Fermi |
Code name | M88-XT CF | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 September 2008 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 660 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 666 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 10.56 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 422.4 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 850 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 54.4 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | N/A | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 vs Radeon HD 6950M
- Tesla C2050 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon HD 6950M
- Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 vs Quadro M2000M
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Tesla C2050 vs Quadro M2000M