Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M2070 Q
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 here:
Main Specs
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 104% more power consumption, than Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 has 506 GB more memory, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is build with RV6xx architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is 86 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 2282 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 in Fortnite is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 in Minecraft is 15% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 44% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | RV6xx | Fermi |
Code name | M88-XT CF | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 September 2008 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 660 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 666 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 10.56 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 422.4 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 850 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 54.4 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | N/A | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 vs Radeon HD 6950M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 6950M
- Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X