FireStream 9250 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4830
When choosing between FireStream 9250 and Mobility Radeon HD 4830, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and Mobility Radeon HD 4830.
FireStream 9250
Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Mobility Radeon HD 4830 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Mobility Radeon HD 4830 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3, DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FireStream 9250 and Mobility Radeon HD 4830 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Mobility Radeon HD 4830 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Mobility Radeon HD 4830 - with Terascale 1.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 75 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Mobility Radeon HD 4830 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 1286 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4830 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Fortnite is 35% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 133% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Mobility Radeon HD 4830 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Terascale 1 |
Code name | RV770 | M97 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 3 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 550 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 826 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 17.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 704.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 700 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 44.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 650M
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 640
- Mobility Radeon HD 4830 vs GeForce GT 650M
- Mobility Radeon HD 4830 vs GeForce GT 640
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 735M
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTS 360M
- Mobility Radeon HD 4830 vs GeForce GT 735M
- Mobility Radeon HD 4830 vs GeForce GTS 360M