Mobility Radeon HD 4830 vs Quadro FX 4800
When comparing Mobility Radeon HD 4830 and Quadro FX 4800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Mobility Radeon HD 4830 and Quadro FX 4800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 4800
Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Mobility Radeon HD 4830 here:
Main Specs
| Mobility Radeon HD 4830 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1535 GB more memory, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830.
- Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 52 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830.
- Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 900 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Battlefield 5 is 60% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4830 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Mobility Radeon HD 4830 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Fortnite is 28% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
Full Specs
| Mobility Radeon HD 4830 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 1 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | M97 | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 March 2009 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Transistor count | 826 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 704.0 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 44.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |