Mobility Radeon HD 4830 vs Tesla C2050
When comparing Mobility Radeon HD 4830 and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Mobility Radeon HD 4830 and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2050
Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Mobility Radeon HD 4830 here:
Main Specs
Mobility Radeon HD 4830 | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla C2050 has 2 GB more memory, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830.
- Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 24 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830.
- Mobility Radeon HD 4830 and Tesla C2050 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 2300 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 700% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 145% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 675% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 278% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 633% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 204% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 3600% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 106% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1133% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1000% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. |
Full Specs
Mobility Radeon HD 4830 | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Terascale 1 | Fermi |
Code name | M97 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 3 March 2009 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 826 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 704.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 44.8 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Mobility Radeon HD 4830 vs GeForce GT 735M
- Mobility Radeon HD 4830 vs GeForce GTS 360M
- Tesla C2050 vs GeForce GT 735M
- Tesla C2050 vs GeForce GTS 360M
- Mobility Radeon HD 4830 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Mobility Radeon HD 4830 vs Quadro M2000M
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Tesla C2050 vs Quadro M2000M