Mobility Radeon HD 4830 vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between Mobility Radeon HD 4830 and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Mobility Radeon HD 4830 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2070
Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Mobility Radeon HD 4830 here:
Main Specs
Mobility Radeon HD 4830 | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla C2070 has 5 GB more memory, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830.
- Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Mobility Radeon HD 4830 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 24 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830.
- Mobility Radeon HD 4830 and Tesla C2070 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 2288 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 350% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 640% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Mobility Radeon HD 4830 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 133% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 257% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 3100% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 966% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 900% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4830. |
Full Specs
Mobility Radeon HD 4830 | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Terascale 1 | Fermi |
Code name | M97 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 3 March 2009 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 826 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 704.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 44.8 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Mobility Radeon HD 4830 vs GeForce GT 735M
- Mobility Radeon HD 4830 vs GeForce GTS 360M
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GT 735M
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTS 360M
- Mobility Radeon HD 4830 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Mobility Radeon HD 4830 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost