FireStream 9250 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850
In this comparison between FireStream 9250 and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9250 will be the best choice, for others Mobility Radeon HD 4850 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9250
Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Mobility Radeon HD 4850 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FireStream 9250 and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 - with Terascale 1.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 125 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850.
- FireStream 9250 and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 1136 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 1% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Fortnite is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
FireStream 9250 and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
FireStream 9250 and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
FireStream 9250 and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Minecraft is 1% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
FireStream 9250 and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Terascale 1 |
Code name | RV770 | M98 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 9 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 800 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 500 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 20.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 850 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 54.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 650M
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 640
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs GeForce GT 650M
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs GeForce GT 640
- FireStream 9250 vs Iris Graphics 5100
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce 930M
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs Iris Graphics 5100
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs GeForce 930M