GeForce GTX 280 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Mobility Radeon HD 4850. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Mobility Radeon HD 4850. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 280
Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Mobility Radeon HD 4850 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 280 and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 - with Terascale 1.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 796 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 257 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
GeForce GTX 280 and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Fortnite is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Minecraft is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Terascale 1 |
Code name | GT200 | M98 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 9 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 240 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 500 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 20.00 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 850 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 54.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Iris Graphics 5100
- GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce 930M
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs Iris Graphics 5100
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs GeForce 930M