GeForce GTX 295 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Mobility Radeon HD 4850, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 295 stacks up against Mobility Radeon HD 4850, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 295
Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Mobility Radeon HD 4850 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1791 GB more memory, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 - with Terascale 1.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 742 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850.
- GeForce GTX 295 and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 149 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 1% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Fortnite is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Terascale 1 |
Code name | GT200B | M98 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 9 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 240 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 500 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 20.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 850 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 54.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Iris Graphics 5100
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce 930M
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs Iris Graphics 5100
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs GeForce 930M